NEXTEC APPLICATIONS v. BROOKWOOD COMPANIES , No. 12-1670 (Fed. Cir. 2013)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ NEXTEC APPLICATIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BROOKWOOD COMPANIES, INC., Defendant-Cross-Appellant. ______________________ 2012-1670, -1685 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in No. 07-CV-6901, Senior Judge Thomas P. Griesa. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ NAGENDRA SETTY, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were STEPHEN S. KORNICZKY, EDWARD V. ANDERSON, and MICHAEL MURPHY. Of counsel was DANIEL NICHOLAS YANNUZZI, of San Diego, California. DARYL L. JOSEFFER, King & Spalding, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for defendant-cross appellant. With him on the brief were KAREN F. GROHMAN; ADAM M. CONRAD, of Charlotte, North Carolina; ETHAN HORWITZ, of New York, New York; and MARY KATHERINE BATES, of Atlanta, Georgia. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: Per Curiam (RADER, Chief Judge, MAYER, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 18, 2013 Date /s/ Daniel E. O Toole Daniel E. O Toole Clerk of Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
