INSITUFORM TECHNOLOGIES v. AMERIK SUPPLIES, INC. , No. 12-1655 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INSITUFORM TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND INA ACQUISITION CORP., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. AMERIK SUPPLIES, INC. (formerly known as BJR Trading U.S.A., Inc.) AND ERIK NIELSEN, Defendants/Third Party Plaintiffs- Appellees, v. COSMIC-SONDERMASCHINENBAU GMBH, Third Party Defendant-Appellant. ______________________ 2012-1655, -1656 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in No. 08-CV-0333, Judge Timothy C. Batten, Sr. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ DEAN L. FRANKLIN, Thompson Coburn LLP, of St. Louis, Missouri, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With him on the brief were ALAN H. NORMAN, MICHAEL L. NEPPLE and MATTHEW A. BRAUNEL. DANIEL A. KENT, Kent Law, P.C., of Alpharetta, Georgia, argued for third party defendant-appellant. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PROST, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 23, 2013 Date /s/ Daniel E. O Toole Daniel E. O Toole Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.