BERRY V CONYERS, No. 11-3207 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. miniteb ~tates QCourt of §ppeaIs for tl)e jfeberaI QCircuit JOHN BERRY, DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, . Petitioner, v. RHONDA K. CONYERS AND DEVON HAUGHTON NORTHOVER, Respondents, AND MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. 2011-3207 Petition for Review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in consolidated case nos. CH0752090925-R-l and AT0752100184-R-1. ON MOTION ORDER BERRY v. CONYERS 2 The National Treasury Employees Union moves without opposition to file a brief amicus curiae. Because the brief would be filed on consent, no motion is necessary. Fed. Cir. R. 29(c). Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is denied as unnecessary. The brief, if it has not already been filed, is due within 10 days of the date of filing of this order. FOR THE COURT DEC 21 2011 Date cc: Abby C. Wright, Esq. Andres M. Grajales, Esq. Jeffrey A. Gauger, Esq. Gregory J. O'Duden, Esq. /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk FILED U.S. COURt OF APl>EALS fOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT OEC 21 2011 s24 JAN HORBAI.Y ClERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.