INTAMIN V MAGNETAR, No. 10-1003 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INTAMIN, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MAGNETAR TECHNOLOGIES CORP., Defendant-Appellee. ____________________ 2010-1003 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in no. 04-CV-0511, Judge Gary A. Feess. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ TED S. WARD, Berke, Kent & Ward LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. JOHN B. SGANGA, JR., Knobbe, Martens, Olson & Bear, LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were PAUL A. STEWART, JOSEPH S. CIANFRANI, DAVID G. JANKOWSKI and CHRISTOPHER L. ROSS. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, PLAGER and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 10, 2010 Date /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.