United States v. Fahnbulleh, No. 11-3045 (D.C. Cir. 2014)
Annotate this CaseDefendants Bondo and Fahnbulleh appealed their convictions and sentences on several counts of fraud in connection with their work on a humanitarian aid program in Africa funded by an agency of the United States government. The court concluded that defendants were not denied a speedy trial where the district court did not clearly err in granting the 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(8) delay periods; there was no error in regards to subject matter jurisdiction and venue; the district court did not err by admitting two government exhibits into evidence; the district court did not err in denying a motion by Bondo for a mistrial where the improper remarks by the prosecutor did not prejudice defendants; and the district court properly calculated defendants' sentencing guidelines range. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment of the district court.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.