En Banc Order - United States Sugar Corp v. EPA, No. 11-1108 (D.C. Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

This opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on July 29, 2016.

Download PDF

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 11-1108 September Term, 2016 EPA-76FR15608 EPA-78FR7138 Filed On: December 23, 2016 United States Sugar Corporation, Petitioner v. Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent -----------------------------American Chemistry Council, et al., Intervenors -----------------------------Consolidated with 11-1124, 11-1134, 11-1142, 11-1145, 11-1159, 11-1165, 11-1172, 11-1174, 11-1181, 13-1086, 13-1087, 13-1091, 13-1092, 13-1096, 13-1097, 13-1098, 13-1099, 13-1100, 13-1103 No. 11-1141 EPA-76FR15554 EPA-78FR7488 American Chemistry Council, Petitioner v. Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent -----------------------------American Forest & Paper Association, et al., Intervenors -----------------------------Consolidated with 11-1182, 11-1207, 11-1208, 13-1105, 13-1107 United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 11-1108 BEFORE: September Term, 2016 Garland*, Chief Judge; Henderson, Rogers, Tatel, Brown, Griffith, Kavanaugh, Srinivasan, Millett*, Pillard, and Wilkins, Circuit Judges ORDER Upon consideration of the petitions of Louisiana Environmental Action Network, Sierra Club, Clean Air Council, Partnership for Policy Integrity, and Environmental Integrity Project for rehearing en banc filed in Nos. 11-1108, et al. and 11-1141, et al., the petition of American Municipal Power, Inc. for rehearing en banc filed in No. 111108, et al., and the absence of a request by any member of the court for a vote, it is ORDERED that the petitions be denied. Per Curiam FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY: /s/ Ken Meadows Deputy Clerk *Chief Judge Garland and Circuit Judge Millett did not participate in this matter. Page 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.