Styre v. Adam, No. 09-15782 (9th Cir. 2011)
Annotate this CasePetitioner was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to imprisonment in 1982. In 2005, the California Board of Prison Terms ("Board") found petitioner eligible for parole and calculated a tentative release date. Four months later, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger reversed the Board's decision, concluding that the gravity of petitioner's offense and his violent criminal history made him unsuitable for parole. After a series of unsuccessful petitions for collateral relief in state court, petitioner was subsequently granted federal habeas corpus relief. At issue was whether petitioner's habeas corpus claims were foreclosed by the Supreme Court's recent decision in Swarthout v. Cooke and the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 ("AEDPA"), 28 U.S.C. 2254. The court held that due process did not require that the Governor hold a second suitability hearing before reversing a parole decision and due process was satisfied because petitioner was allowed to speak at his parole hearing and to contest the evidence against him, was afforded access to his records in advance, and was notified as to the reasons why parole was denied. The court also held that, because there was no Supreme Court precedent holding that a state governor must conduct a second parole hearing before reversing a parole board's favorable decision, petitioner's habeas corpus claims necessarily failed. Accordingly, in light of Cooke and AEDPA, the court reversed the district court's order directing habeas corpus relief.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.