United States v. Steven Robinson, No. 15-2119 (8th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Per Curiam -Before Loken, Bowman and Murphy, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. Anders case. Defendant's sentence is not substantively unreasonable. [ October 08, 2015
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 15-2119 ___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Steven Dale Robinson lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant ____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City ____________ Submitted: September 30, 2015 Filed: October 9, 2015 [Unpublished] ____________ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM. Steven Robinson appeals the within-Guidelines-range sentence that the district court imposed after he pleaded guilty to a federal bank robbery charge. His counsel 1 1 The Honorable Greg Kays, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. has moved to withdraw, and in a brief filed under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), counsel challenges the substantive reasonableness of the sentence. Upon careful review, we conclude that the sentence is not substantively unreasonable. See United States v. Feemster, 572 F.3d 455, 461 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (abuse-of-discretion review); see also United States v. Callaway, 762 F.3d 754, 760 (8th Cir. 2014). Further, having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. The judgment is affirmed, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. ______________________________ -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
