Aminata Williams v. 21st Mortgage Corporation, No. 16-1659 (4th Cir. 2017)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1659 AMINATA M. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. 21ST MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee, and U. S. BANK N.A., Trustee for the RASC 2007-EMX1 Trust; OCWEN LOAN SERVICING; RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC; JOHN DOES 1 through 10, Defendants. No. 17-1534 AMINATA M. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. 21ST MORTGAGE CORPORATION; JOHN DOES 1 through 10; OCWEN LOAN SERVICING; RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC; U. S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Trustee for the RASC 2007-EMX1 Trust, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang; Paula Xinis, District Judges. (8:16-cv-01210-PX) Submitted: November 20, 2017 Decided: November 30, 2017 Before AGEE, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles C. Iweanoge, THE IWEANOGES’ FIRM, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Robert H. Hillman, SAMUEL I. WHITE PC, Rockville, Maryland; Brian J. Slipakoff, Phillip Chong, DUANE MORRIS LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Aminata Williams appeals from the district court’s orders: (1) denying her motion for a preliminary injunction/temporary restraining order to prevent a foreclosure sale and, (2) dismissing her civil action as barred by res judicata. We have reviewed the record included on appeal as well as the district court’s opinions and we find no reversible error. Accordingly we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Williams v. 21st Mortgage Corp., No. 8:16-cv-01210-PX (D. Md. filed May 3, 2016, and entered May 4, 2016; Mar. 27, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.