US v. Reginald McKinnon, No. 15-7321 (4th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7321 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. REGINALD MCKINNON, a/k/a Reg, a/k/a Big Reggie, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (4:14-cr-00259-RBH-8) Submitted: November 17, 2015 Decided: November 20, 2015 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reginald McKinnon, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Reginald McKinnon appeals the district denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2012) motion. the record and find no reversible error. court’s order We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. McKinnon, No. 4:14-cr-00259-RBH-8 (D.S.C. Aug. 6, 2015). dispense with contentions are oral argument adequately because presented in the the facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.