Owaiian Jones v. The Supreme Court of Virginia, No. 14-7396 (4th Cir. 2014)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7396 OWAIIAN M. JONES, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA; THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA; THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Western District of Virginia, Roanoke Division; PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; GOVERNOR OF VIRGINIA; MAYOR OF CITY OF ROANOKE, Defendants - Appellees. No. 14-7400 OWAIIAN M. JONES, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ROANOKE WILLIAM ALLEN, CITY CIRCUIT COURT BROADHURST; CHARLES JUDGES; DORSEY; STATE OF VIRGINIA; JOHN DOES; TIMOTHY Defendants - Appellees. No. 14-7401 OWAIIAN M. JONES, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. ROANOKE CITY SHERIFF'S OFFICE; ROANOKE CITY JAIL; ROANOKE CITY JAIL PHYSICIAN; JOHN DOES; TIMOTHY ALLEN; DR. ALI, Defendants - Appellees. No. 14-7487 OWAIIAN M. JONES Plaintiff – Appellant, v. WALTER L. DAVIS, SR.; EDWARD L. JENKINS; Roanoke City Sheriff Office; JOHN DOES, DEPUTY LEE, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (7:14-cv-00416-MFU-RSB; 7:14-cv-00408-MFU-RSB; 7:14-cv-00415-MFU-RSB; 7:14-cv-00502-MFU-RSB) Submitted: December 16, 2014 Before DUNCAN Circuit Judge. and DIAZ, Decided: Circuit Judges, December 19, 2014 and DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Owaiian M. Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: Owaiian M. Jones appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaints for failure to comply with the court orders. error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. The Supreme Court of Virginia, No. 7:14-cv-00416-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. Aug. 29, 2014); Jones v. Roanoke City Circuit Court, No. 7:14-cv-00408-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. Aug. 29, 2014); Jones v. Ronaoke City Sheriff’s Office, No. 7:14-cv-00415-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. Aug. 29, 2014); Jones v. Davis, No. 7:14-cv-00502-MFU-RSB dispense with contentions are oral (W.D. argument adequately Va. Sept. because presented in the the 30, facts 2014). We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.