Eugene Holmes v. Dayna Causby, No. 14-2011 (4th Cir. 2014)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-2011 EUGENE T. HOLMES, a/k/a Eugene "Sherlock" Holmes, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DAYNA CAUSBY, Director, Board of Elections; DANIEL C. AYSCUE, President, Alliance Bank & Trust; GREGORY MCINTYRE, Attorney; TIM MOORE; ROGER WOODARD, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00241-MR) Submitted: December 16, 2014 Before DUNCAN Circuit Judge. and DIAZ, Circuit Decided: December 18, 2014 Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eugene T. Holmes, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Eugene T. Holmes appeals the district court’s order dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Holmes does not challenge in his informal brief the basis for the district court’s disposition but instead appears to raise new claims, he has forfeited Accordingly, dispense we with contentions are appellate affirm oral review the district argument adequately of the court’s because presented court’s in the the order. judgment. facts We and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
