Dickinson Adionser v. US, No. 12-7639 (4th Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7639 DICKINSON NORMAN ADIONSER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ADMINISTRATION AGENCY, UNITED STATES DRUG ENFORCEMENT Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:12cv-00700-RWT) Submitted: November 20, 2012 Before TRAXLER, Judges. Chief Judge, Decided: November 27, 2012 and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dickinson Norman Adionser, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Dickinson Norman Adionser appeals the district court s orders denying relief on his civil complaint filed pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a (2006), the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (2006), and the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201 (2006), and denying his subsequent motion to alter or amend. record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm. Adionser v. United States, No. 8:12-cv-00700-RWT (D. Md. Mar. 20, 2012, July 24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.