United States v. Gomez, No. 10-1095 (2d Cir. 2013)
Annotate this CaseDefendant appealed from convictions for racketeering conspiracy in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. 1962(d), murder in aid of racketeering, and unlawful possession of a firearm. The court considered all of defendant's claims on appeal, and as to those issues for which the record was sufficiently developed, the court found his claims to be without merit. The court affirmed the judgment of the district court, without prejudice to defendant's filing a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 to pursue his claim that his attorney did not advise him of his rights to testify.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.