Tina Gee v. Jada Mitchell, et al., No. 23-12627 (11th Cir. 2023)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
USCA11 Case: 23-12627 Document: 36-2 Date Filed: 10/24/2023 Page: 1 of 2 In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-12627 ____________________ TINA GEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus JADA MITCHELL, JONES, Captain, SPENCER, Lt, CHRISTIAN, STANTON, Officers, et al., Defendants-Appellees, USCA11 Case: 23-12627 2 Document: 36-2 Date Filed: 10/24/2023 Order of the Court Page: 2 of 2 23-12627 THE CITY OF TUSCALOOSA, et al., Defendants. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama D.C. Docket No. 7:23-cv-00388-LSC ____________________ Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and LUCK, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: The motions to dismiss filed by appellees are DENIED. Tina Gee appeals from the district court’s July 10, 2023 final order dismissing her case with prejudice. The appellees argue that the appeal is untimely because Gee filed her notice of appeal on August 10, 2023, 31 days after the final order was entered. However, the district court never entered judgment in a separate document, so Gee was entitled to an additional 150 days in which to appeal beyond the normal 30-day deadline. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), 4(a)(7)(A); Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), (c). Thus, Gee’s notice of appeal is timely.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
