PayCargo, LLC v. CargoSprint LLC, et al, No. 23-10170 (11th Cir. 2024)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
USCA11 Case: 23-10170 Document: 52-1 Date Filed: 04/19/2024 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-10170 ____________________ PAYCARGO, LLC, Plainti -Appellee, versus CARGOSPRINT LLC, JOSHUA WOLF, An individual, Defendants-Appellants. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 1:19-cv-22995-LFL USCA11 Case: 23-10170 Document: 52-1 2 Date Filed: 04/19/2024 Opinion of the Court Page: 2 of 2 23-10170 ____________________ Before WILSON, LUCK, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Defendants-Appellants CargoSprint, LLC and Joshua Wolf appeal the district court’s final judgment in favor of Plaintiff-Appellee PayCargo, LLC. Defendants-Appellants alleged the following on appeal: I. The district court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of PayCargo on its Lanham Act claims. II. The district court erred in denying their motion for summary judgment on the breach of contract claims. III. When calculating damages, the district court abused its discretion in declining to admit Defendants-Appellants’ bank records and entire database concerning costs and payments. IV. The district court abused its discretion in awarding attorney’s fees to PayCargo under the Lanham Act, finding that the case was exceptional. After careful review and consideration of the briefs and the record, and having the benefit of oral argument, we find no reversible error in the proceedings in the district court. Therefore, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
