USA v. Richard Palacios, No. 22-12722 (11th Cir. 2024)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

USCA11 Case: 22-12722 Document: 44-1 Date Filed: 03/26/2024 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-12722 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plainti -Appellee, versus RICHARD PALACIOS, a.k.a. Cachinge, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:18-cr-00509-CEH-TGW-3 USCA11 Case: 22-12722 2 Document: 44-1 Date Filed: 03/26/2024 Opinion of the Court Page: 2 of 2 22-12722 ____________________ Before WILLIAM PRYOR, Chief Judge, NEWSOM, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Darlene Calzon Barror, appointed counsel for Richard Palacios in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Palacios’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.