USA v. Damien Madison, No. 21-11626 (11th Cir. 2021)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

USCA11 Case: 21-11626 Date Filed: 12/09/2021 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-11626 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DAMIEN MADISON, a.k.a. Pit, a.k.a. Slick, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cr-00145-TWT-JKL-36 ____________________ USCA11 Case: 21-11626 2 Date Filed: 12/09/2021 Page: 2 of 2 Opinion of the Court 21-11626 Before WILSON, ROSENBAUM, and LUCK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: David Jones, appointed counsel for Damien Madison in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Johnson’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED. Madison’s motion for appointment of new counsel is DENIED as moot.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.