Jesse Loor v. Saily Puentte, et al., No. 14-15431 (11th Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 14-15431 Date Filed: 10/07/2015 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 14-15431 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cv-20612-BB JESSE LOOR, individually, and as next friend for J.L. a minor, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus SAILY PUENTE, CARIDAD HERMIDA, LISSETTE TARRAGO, OFFICER J. HOROVITZ, #7578, Metro Dade Police Department, OFFICER ROSSI, #5731, Metro Dade Police Department, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida ________________________ (October 7, 2015) Case: 14-15431 Date Filed: 10/07/2015 Page: 2 of 2 Before WILSON, JORDAN, and JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Jesse Loor, a state pretrial detainee proceeding in forma pauperis, appeals pro se from the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 lawsuit for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). After considering Loor’s brief and conducting a de novo review of the record on appeal, we find that the issues and arguments Loor raises are unavailing. Since Loor is proceeding pro se, we liberally construe his pleadings; however, we may not rewrite Loor’s complaint. See Snow v. DirecTV, Inc., 450 F.3d 1314, 1320 (11th Cir. 2006); Tannenbaum v. United States, 148 F.3d 1262, 1263 (11th Cir. 1998) (per curiam). Loor failed to state a facially plausible claim for relief against any of the named defendants. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009); see also § 1915(e)(2)(B) (compelling dismissal when an in forma pauperis case fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted). Accordingly, Loor’s action was properly dismissed, and we affirm the district court. AFFIRMED. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.