Western Heritage Insurance Company v, Dennis Mark Montana, et al., No. 14-13542 (11th Cir. 2015)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 14-13542 Date Filed: 11/23/2015 Page: 1 of 3 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ Nos. 14-13542 & 14-13657 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cv-01116-SCB-TGW WESTERN HERITAGE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff - Counter Defendant - Appellee Cross Appellant, versus DENNIS MARK MONTANA, a Guardian of Paul N. Blevins, as Assignee of Suncoast Preferred Investment Corp., REBEKAH J. PATTERSON, as Guardian of minor children, D.B., D.B., F.B., as Assignee of Suncoast Preferred Investment Corp., Defendants - Counter Claimants – Counter Defendants - Appellants Cross-Appellees. ________________________ Nos. 15-10967 & 15-11166 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 8:13-cv-01116-SCB-TGW Case: 14-13542 Date Filed: 11/23/2015 Page: 2 of 3 WESTERN HERITAGE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Arizona corporation, Plaintiff - Counter Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee, versus DENNIS MARK MONTANA, as Guardian of Paul N. Blevins, as Assignee of Suncoast Preferred Investment Corp., a Florida citizen, REBEKAH J. PATTERSON, as Guardian of minor children, D.B., D.B., F.B., as Assignee of Suncoast Preferred Investment Corp., a Florida citizen, Defendants - Counter Claimants – Counter Defendants - Appellees Cross-Appellants. _______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida ________________________ (November 23, 2015) Before ROSENBAUM, JULIE CARNES, and DUBINA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: We have before us the related appeals and cross-appeals in an insurancecoverage dispute between the Western Heritage Insurance Company (“Western Heritage”) and the guardians of Paul Blevins and Blevins’s children (“Blevins”). We have carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ briefs, and we have had the 2 Case: 14-13542 Date Filed: 11/23/2015 Page: 3 of 3 benefit of oral argument. We now affirm the district court’s orders in all respects for the reasons articulated by the district court in its orders. AFFIRMED. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
