In Re: Sophia Kiatecki, Debtor. Sophia Kiatecki,plaintiff-appellant, v. Thomas L. Lackey, Trustee-appellee, 8 F.3d 819 (4th Cir. 1993)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 8 F.3d 819 (4th Cir. 1993) Submitted: October 19, 1993. Decided: October 25, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

Sophia Kiatecki, Appellant Pro Se.

Thomas L. Lackey, Bowie, Maryland, for Appellee.

D. Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders dismissing her bankruptcy appeal1  and denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kiatecki v. Lackey, No. CA-92-3375-L (D. Md. Feb. 25, 1993; Apr. 2, 1993). We deny Kiatecki's Motion for Stay Pending Appeal2  and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 1

Although Appellant preserved her appeal of the order denying her Rule 60(b) motion, her appeal of the order of dismissal is untimely. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (1)

 2

Appellant's Motion for Emergency Hearing on Motion for Stay Pending Appeal has been granted by this decision

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.