David Maurice Beatty, Plaintiff-appellant, v. James Phillip Griffin, Defendant-appellee, 74 F.3d 1230 (4th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseDavid Maurice Beatty, Appellant Pro Se.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Beatty v. Griffin, No. CA-95-234-CT-5-BO (E.D.N.C. July 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
The district court's typographical error that Plaintiff, rather than Defendant, was employed by the North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services is of no moment
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.