William C. Ellis, Plaintiff--appellant, v. Anne Arundel County Housing Authority; Larry Lyon; Lorimandrin, Defendants--appellees, 72 F.3d 126 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseWilliam C. Ellis, Appellant Pro Se.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ellis v. Anne Arundel County, No. CA-95-2314-K (D. Md., Aug. 15, 1995).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We deny Appellant's motions for appointment of counsel and for a stay of the district court's proceedings pending appeal
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
