Richard Blue-sky, Aka Rickie Blue-sky, Plaintiff-appellant, v. James Gomez, Director; Teena Farmon, Warden Ccwf; R.e.stebbins, Correctional Officer; C. Castillo; Jack R.reagan, Chief Inmate Appeals; Lew Kuykendall and Duanetessmer, Information Systems Representative, Defendants-appellees, 69 F.3d 543 (9th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 69 F.3d 543 (9th Cir. 1995) Submitted Oct. 24, 1995. *Decided Nov. 1, 1995

Before: BEEZER, THOMPSON, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

California state prisoner Richard (Rickie) Blue-Sky appeals pro se the district court's denial of her motion for injunctive relief in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, alleging prison officials violated her constitutional rights when they confiscated her word processor. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a) (1), and we affirm.

We review the district court's denial of a request for a preliminary injunction for abuse of discretion. Diamontiney v. Borg, 918 F.2d 793, 795 (9th Cir. 1990). We will reverse only if the district court based its decision on an erroneous legal standard on clearly erroneous findings of fact. Senate of California v. Moscbacher, 968 F.2d 974, 975 (9th Cir. 1992).

We have reviewed the record, and we affirm for the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, adopted in full by the district court.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.