George B. Parks; Marna C. Parks, Petitioner-appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-appellee, 67 F.3d 308 (9th Cir. 1995)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 67 F.3d 308 (9th Cir. 1995) Submitted Sept. 18, 1995. *Decided Sept. 22, 1995

Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

Taxpayers George and Marna Parks appeal pro se the Tax Court's decision, upholding the Commissioner of Internal Revenue's ("Commissioner") determination that the Parks were liable for a deficiency in income tax for tax year 1987. The Tax Court found that the Parks's had overstated the fair market value of a sailboat which they donated to the California Maritime Academy Foundation. The Parks also appeal the Tax Court's decision upholding the Commissioner's additions to tax for negligence under I.R.C. Sec. 6653(a) (1) (A) & (B), for making a valuation overstatement under I.R.C. Sec. 6659, and for entering into a tax motivated transaction pursuant to 26 I.R.C. Sec. 6621(c).

We review for clear error the tax court's determination of fair market value. Doherty v. Commissioner, 16 F.3d 338, 339 (9th Cir. 1994). Whether underpayment was attributable to a valuation overstatement for purposes of addition to tax under section 6659 turns on a factual finding also reviewed for clear error. Wolf v. Commissioner, 4 F.3d 709, 715 (9th Cir. 1993). Finally, we review for clear error the tax court's decision to uphold the assessment of a negligence penalty pursuant to section 6653, and the imposition of increased interest pursuant to section 6621. Id.

We have jurisdiction under 26 U.S.C. § 7482. We have reviewed the record, and affirm the for reasons stated by the Tax Court in its memorandum opinion.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.