Albert Russell Clay, Jr., Petitioner--appellant, v. Edward W. Murray, Director of the Virginia Department Ofcorrections, Respondent--appellee, 60 F.3d 821 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseAlbert Russell Clay, Jr., appellant pro se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, for appellee.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Clay v. Murray, No. CA-92-230-N (E.D. Va. Mar. 2, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
