United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Sheldon I. Matzkin, Defendant-appellant, 52 F.3d 322 (4th Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseJohn DeWitt Cline, Williams & Connolly, Washington, DC, for Appellant. Joseph John Aronica, Assistant United States Attorney, Jack I. Hanley, Office of The United States Attorney, Alexandria, VA, for Appellee.
Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Matzkin, Nos. CR-92-437-A, CA-94-206-AM (E.D. Va. Mar. 22, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We deny Appellant's motion for release pending appeal
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
