United States of America, Appellee, v. Eddie D. Ferguson, Appellant, 5 F.3d 532 (8th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseBefore FAGG, WOLLMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Ferguson appeals the district court's1 denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized during his arrest for bank robbery. The district court adopted the magistrate judge's2 recommendation to deny the motion to suppress. Ferguson subsequently entered a conditional plea of guilty to bank robbery charges, reserving the right to appeal the suppression issue. After carefully reviewing the briefs and the record in this case, we conclude that the district court committed no error in adopting the well-reasoned report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and in denying the motion to suppress. An opinion would have no precedential value. Accordingly, the decision of the district court is affirmed without opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.