United States of America, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Herbert A. Mims, Defendant Appellant, 25 F.3d 1042 (4th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-92-88, CA-93-1159)
Herbert A. Mims, appellant pro se.
Michael R. Smythers, Asst. U.S. Atty., Charles Dee Griffith, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Norfolk, VA, Albert David Alberi, Sp. Asst. U.S. Atty., Virginia Beach, VA, for appellee.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM
Appellant appeals from the district court orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration of that order. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Mims, Nos. CR-92-88; CA-93-1159 (E.D. Va. Feb. 15 & Mar. 3, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
