Richard Lamar Fenstermacher, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Glenn M. Weatherholtz; William Meadows; Paul T. Yoder;evelyn Ray; Lynn Moore; Ronald Keyser; Glennlloyd, Defendants Appellees, 19 F.3d 10 (4th Cir. 1994)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. B. Waugh Crigler, Magistrate Judge. (CA-92-564-R, CA-92-565-R, CA-92-645-R)
Richard Lamar Fenstermacher, appellant Pro Se.
J. Ross Newell, III, Timberlake, Smith, Thomas & Moses, P.C., Staunton, VA; Gregory Thomas St. Ours, Wharton, Aldhizer & Weaver, Harrisonburg, VA, for appellees.
W.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the magistrate judge's order* denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Fenstermacher v. Weatherholtz, Nos. CA-92-564-R, CA-92-565-R, CA-92-645-R (W.D. Va. April 28, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
The parties consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C.A. Sec. 636(c) (1) (West 1993)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
