United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. David Lee Alexander, Defendant-appellant, 145 F.3d 1341 (9th Cir. 1998)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
Before: SCHROEDER, TROTT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM*
PRO, J., Presiding
Submitted May 13, 1998**
David Lee Alexander, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his coram nobis petition pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651, to vacate his 1982 bank robbery conviction. He contends that he is entitled to coram nobis relief because the district court lacked jurisdiction to prosecute him under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a), his guilty plea was invalid, and counsel was ineffective in failing to raise these two issues. Alexander did not qualify for a writ of coram nobis because he still was serving his term of parole when the district court denied relief. See United States v. Span, 75 F.3d 1383, 1386 & n. 5 (9th Cir. 1996) (coram nobis relief not available for petitioner in custody); Estate of McKinney v. United States, 71 F.3d 779, 781 (9th Cir. 1995) (same).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.