Mark Frederick Durbin, Plaintiff-appellant, v. City of Seattle; C. Kimi Kondo; James Jackson, Defendants-appellees, 145 F.3d 1337 (9th Cir. 1998)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Barbara J. Rothstein, District Judge, Presiding.
Before SCHROEDER, TROTT and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM*
Mark Frederick Durbin appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Based on a de novo review, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's April 25, 1997 order. See Patel v. Penman, 103 F.3d 868, 874 (9th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 117 S. Ct. 1845, 137 L. Ed. 2d 1048 (1997).
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Accordingly, the parties' requests for oral argument are denied. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
