Harrison Dwight Foos; Carolyn Sue Foos, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Steve Timken, Defendant-appellee, 125 F.3d 861 (10th Cir. 1997)
Annotate this CaseBefore SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, PORFILIO and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
SEYMOUR, C.J.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Plaintiffs Harrison Dwight Foos and Carolyn Sue Foos appeal the dismissal without prejudice of their complaint against Steve Timken. We agree with the district court that plaintiffs have failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court substantially for the reasons given in the court's Memorandum and Order dated May 5, 1997.
This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
