United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Anselmo Bernal Hernandez, Defendant-appellant, 122 F.3d 1075 (9th Cir. 1997)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 122 F.3d 1075 (9th Cir. 1997) Submitted Aug. 25, 1997. **Decided Aug. 28, 1997

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California James M. Ideman, District Judge, Presiding.

Before SCHROEDER, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM* 

Federal prisoner Anselmo Bernal Hernandez appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his 1993 conviction for narcotics offenses. Hernandez asserts that he was subjected to double jeopardy because of the administrative forfeiture of $13,280.00 in U.S. currency. The district court properly ruled that Hernandez's claim is foreclosed by United States v. Ursery, 116 S. Ct. 2135 (1996).

AFFIRMED.1 

 **

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

 *

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

 1

Hernandez's request in his brief for certification of a successive § 2255 motion is denied

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.