United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. John Gable, Jr., Defendant-appellant, 112 F.3d 517 (9th Cir. 1997)
Annotate this CaseBefore: BROWNING, THOMPSON, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
John Gable, Jr., appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his 1992 conviction and sentence for several offenses including racketeering, conspiracy, and money laundering. Gable's § 2255 motion asserted that his conviction and sentence violated the Double Jeopardy Clause in light of the civil forfeiture action brought by the government pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a) (1) (A) against Gable's real property. The district court properly ruled that this claim is foreclosed by United States v. Ursery, 116 S. Ct. 2135 (1996).
Gable's claims (not included in his § 2255 motion before the district court) that the seizure of his property violated the Due Process and Excessive Fines Clauses are not cognizable under § 2255, which confers jurisdiction only over challenges to one's conviction or sentence.
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.