Roland Corporation U.s., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff/appellee, v. Atmel Corporation, et al., Defendants/appellants, 110 F.3d 69 (9th Cir. 1997)
Annotate this CaseBefore: SNEED, FARRIS and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
This appeal from the grant of a motion for a preliminary injunction comes to us for review under Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a) (1), and we affirm.
"A district court's order granting preliminary injunctive relief is subject to limited review: It will be reversed only where the district court abused its discretion or based its decision on an erroneous legal standard or on clearly erroneous findings of fact." Triad Systems Corp. v. Southeastern Exp. Co., 64 F.3d 1330, 1334 (9th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 1015 (1996).
The record before us shows that the district court did not abuse its discretion or base its decision on an erroneous legal standard or on clearly erroneous findings of fact. See id. Accordingly, the preliminary injunction is AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.