Charles T. Sherwin, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Ronald L. Billmyer; Ronald G. Sprovero; Donald L.robinson; Laverne Harper; William P. Butler; Daniel R.levinson; Maria L. Johnson; Susan L. Williams; Timothy M.dirks; Constance Newman; Steven J. Gillingham; Williamcalwell, Defendants-appellees, 978 F.2d 1256 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-91-89-CIV-3-BR)
Charles T. Sherwin, Appellant Pro Se.
Eileen G. Coffey, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
E.D.N.C.
Affirmed.
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Charles T. Sherwin appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment for Defendants in Sherwin's Bivens* -type action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sherwin v. Billmyer, No. CA-91-89-CIV-3-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 15, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
