Anthony Horton, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Edward W. Murray; Edward C. Morris; William P. Roger; C.h. Allen; David A. Williams; Ronald L. Cassel; Randall B.kahelski; Joe Edmond; Dianne Jefferson; Layton T. Lester;charles Thompson; Central Classification Board,defendants-appellees, 978 F.2d 1255 (4th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 978 F.2d 1255 (4th Cir. 1992) Submitted: August 31, 1992Decided: October 26, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond.

Anthony Horton, Appellant Pro Se.

Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for Appellees.

E.D. Va.

DISMISSED.

Before SPROUSE and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


OPINION

Anthony Horton appeals the district court's order requiring him to submit an address where the administrator of the estate of Defendant Kahelski can be served. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable.*  This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

 *

We deny Horton's motion for an extension of time to file an informal brief

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.