Unpublished Dispositionalabama-tennessee Natural Gas Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondentdecatur Utilities Gas Department, City of Decatur, Alabama,et al., Intervenors.baltimore Gas & Electric Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent,louisiana Gas Service Company, et al., Intervenors.boston Gas Company, et al., Petitioners, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent,cng Transmission Corporation, et al., Intervenors.chattanooga Gas Company and Roanoke Gas Company, Petitioners, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent,east Tennessee Natural Gas Company, Intervenor.cng Transmission Corporation, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent,boston Gas Company, et al., Intervenors.columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent,public Service Commission of the State of New York, et al.,intervenors.columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent,associated Natural Gas Company, et al., Intervenors.columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent,associated Natural Gas Company, a Division of Arkansaswestern Gas Company, et al., Intervenors.columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent,associated Natural Gas Company, et al., Intervenors.columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent,consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., et al., Intervenors.columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent,process Gas Consumers Group, et al., Intervenors.columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent.columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent.consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. and Publicservice Electric & Gas Co., Petitioners, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent.consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent,central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, et al., Intervenors.consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent.equitable Gas Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent,the Municipal Defense Group, et al., Intervenors.equitable Gas Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent,associated Natural Gas Company, Division of Arkansas Westerngas Company, et al., Intervenors.illinois Power Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent,laclede Gas Company, et al., Intervenors.illinois Power Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent,laclede Gas Company, et al., Intervenors.indiana Gas Company, Inc., and Ohio River Pipelinecorporation, Petitioners, v. Federal Energy Regulation Commission, Respondent,public Service Commission of the State of New York, et al.,intervenors.indiana Gas Company, Inc., Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent,columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, et al., Intervenors.kansas Power and Light Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent.the Kansas Power and Light Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent,union Gas System, Inc., et al., Intervenors.the Kansas Power and Light Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent.the Kansas Power and Light Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent,arkla Energy Resources, et al., Intervenors.the Kansas Power and Light Company, and the Missouri Publicservice Division of Utilicorp United, Inc., Petitioners, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Respondent.the Kansas Power and Light Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commissio, 925 F.2d 487 (D.C. Cir. 1991)
Annotate this CaseBefore WALD, Chief Judge, and MIKVA and CLARENCE THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the motions to summarily reverse and vacate agency orders, the motions to summarily reverse and vacate agency orders and remand records with instructions, the responses thereto and the replies; respondent's motions for remand, the responses thereto and the replies; the motions to govern further proceedings, the responses thereto and the replies; the motions for limited remand, the responses thereto and the replies; the motions to vacate and remand, the responses thereto and the replies; the motions to summarily grant petitions for review, the responses thereto and the replies; the motions for expedition, the responses thereto and the replies; the motions to lodge pleadings with the court, the responses thereto and the replies; the motions for leave to intervene out of time and the responses thereto; the motions for leave to file motions out of time, the reponses thereto and the replies; and the motions for leave to file lodged pleadings, it is
ORDERED that respondent's motion for remand be granted. The above-captioned cases are remanded to the Commission to conduct further proceedings consistent with this court's mandate in Associated Gas Distributors v. FERC, 893 F.2d 349 (D.C. Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 59 U.S.L.W. 3271 (U.S. Oct. 9, 1990). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that all motions to summarily reverse and vacate agency orders be denied. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that all motions for limited remand be denied. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that all unopposed motions for leave to file lodged pleadings be granted. The Clerk is directed to file all lodged pleadings. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that all remaining motions be dismissed as moot.
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C. Cir. Rule 15.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
