Unpublished Dispositionunited States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Richard L. Stoops, Defendant-appellant, 888 F.2d 1392 (6th Cir. 1989)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 888 F.2d 1392 (6th Cir. 1989) Oct. 30, 1989

Before BOGGS and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and ENGEL, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.


Defendant appeals his conviction for using a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime.

The two issues raised by defendant were decided by this court, adversely to his cause, after he filed his brief. In United States v. Henry, 878 F.2d 937, 943 (6th Cir. 1989), we decided that possession with intent to distribute is a drug trafficking crime within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (2), and, in United States v. Acosta-Cazares, 878 F.2d 945, 951-52 (6th Cir. 1989), we adopted the so-called "fortress" doctrine, saying that a person uses a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime within the contemplation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (1), when the evidence shows that he kept a weapon in his residence, readily accessible, to facilitate illegal conduct with controlled substances.

As the opinions in those cases are dispositive of this appeal, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.