Thomas D. Crooks, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Kenneth D. Mckellar, Warden, Central Correctionalinstitution, Clarence L. Todd, Food Servicedirector, Central Correctionalinstitution, Defendants-appellees, 884 F.2d 1387 (4th Cir. 1989)
Annotate this CaseThomas D. Crooks, appellant pro se.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas D. Crooks appeals the magistrate's denial of his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Because the parties did not consent to the magistrate's jurisdiction, proper review of the magistrate's order is in the district court. This Court has no jurisdiction over the appeal. Tripati v. Rison, 847 F.2d 548 (9th Cir. 1988); Silberstein v. Silberstein, 859 F.2d 40, 41-42 (7th Cir. 1988). Rather than dismiss this appeal, we find that the interest of justice dictates transferring this case, and the pending motions to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and for appointment of counsel, to the district for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 28 U.S.C. § 1631. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issue recently has been decided authoritatively.
TRANSFERRED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.