Eddie Woodrow Gray, Petitioner-appellant, v. Manfred G. Holland, Warden, Respondent-appellee, 831 F.2d 1057 (4th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseEddie Woodrow Gray, appellant pro se.
Charles G. Brown, III, Office of Attorney General of West Virginia, for appellee.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate's reconn endation discloses that this appeal from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Gray v. Holland, C/A No. 84-5041 (S.D.W. Va., Feb. 3, 1987).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
