Unpublished Dispositiondaniel M. Jones, Petitioner-appellant, v. Gene Scroggy, Warden, Respondent-appellee, 818 F.2d 866 (6th Cir. 1987)
Annotate this CaseBefore JONES and RYAN, Circuit Judges, and CELEBREZZE, Senior Circuit Judge.
ORDER
This pro se petitioner appeals from a judgment of the district court which dismissed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Upon examination of the record and briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
For the reasons stated in the magistrate's report and recommendation, adopted by the district court, the judgment of July 24, 1986 is affirmed. Rule 9(b) (5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
