National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Lord Industries, Inc., Respondent, 498 F.2d 1342 (6th Cir. 1974)
Annotate this CasePetition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.
Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, Thomas A. Woodley, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner.
Cross, Wrock, Miller & Vieson, William A. Coughlin, Jr., Detroit, Mich., on brief, for respondent.
Before WEICK, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
On consideration of the application for enforcement, the record, and arguments and briefs of counsel, we are of the opinion that there is substantial evidence to support the order of the Board, reported at 207 NLRB No. 69, which found that Respondent had violated sections 8(a) (1) and (3) of the Act.
It is therefore ordered that enforcement be granted and that the mandate of the Court issue forthwith.
In view of this disposition of the case we find it unnecessary for us to pass upon the motion for a protective order.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
