United States of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Joel Mark De Smet, Appellant, 456 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1972)
Annotate this CaseJoel Shawn (argued), of Lukes & Bassoni, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Stephen E. Clark (argued), of Athearn, Chandler, & Hoffman, James L. Browning, Jr., U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CHAMBERS and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction in this selective service case is affirmed.
We decide here that if there was some irregularity in the "call" process, there is no evidence of prejudice to De Smet.
However, we reject the contention that there was irregularity in the "calling."
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
