United States, Plaintiff-appellee, v. James Ballentine, Defendant-appellant, 245 F.2d 223 (2d Cir. 1957)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit - 245 F.2d 223 (2d Cir. 1957) May 22, 1957

James Ballentine, pro se.

Before MEDINA and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges, and GALSTON, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.


As the attorney assigned by us on March 25, 1957 has examined the transcript of the testimony at the trial and given the matter as a whole careful consideration and reports that he can find no merit whatever in the appeal and wishes to be relieved, we accede to his request.

Appellant's application for the assignment of new counsel is denied. United States ex rel. Tierney v. Richmond, 2 Cir., 245 F.2d 222.

Appellant's motion for an extension of time within which to file a brief and appendix pro se is granted and he may file same at any time on or before September 1, 1957.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.