IN RE: ALLISON M. BLACK MCIVER, Respondent.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 15-BG-735 IN RE: ALLISON M. BLACK MCIVER, Respondent. Bar Registration No. 480248 Board Docket No. 15-BD-099 BDN: 488-10, et al. BEFORE: Glickman and McLeese, Associate Judges; and Ferren, Senior Judge. ORDER (Filed - December 10, 2015) On consideration of respondent’s claim, pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 13 (e), that she suffers from a disability because of mental or physical illness or infirmity, which makes it impossible for her to present an adequate defense in pending disciplinary proceedings; respondent’s request for holding proceedings in abeyance due to disability; respondent’s medical records, including a forensic psychiatric evaluation concluding that respondent is incapacitated from the practice of law; and Bar Counsel’s consent that respondent is incapacitated from the practice of law, it is ORDERED that respondent is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia, effective immediately, and that any pending matters be held in abeyance pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13 (e) until further order of the court pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13 (c). Respondent’s reinstatement to the District of Columbia Bar shall be in accordance with the provisions of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13 (g) and it is FURTHER ORDERED that respondent’s attention is drawn to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, §§ 14 and 16, relating to suspended attorneys; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall file an affidavit in compliance with D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) with the court and the Board and shall serve a copy of the affidavit on Bar Counsel. PER CURIAM
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
