In re: Robert Seguin

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 15-BG-457 IN RE: ROBERT SEGUIN, Respondent. Bar Registration No. 938449 BEFORE: BDN: 23-15 Thompson, Associate Judge, and Nebeker and Farrell, Senior Judges. ORDER (FILED – July 23, 2015) On consideration of the certified order disbarring respondent from the practice of law in the state of New Jersey by consent, this court’s May 27, 2015, order directing respondent to show cause he should not be disbarred as reciprocal discipline, and the statement of Bar Counsel, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file either a response to this court’s order to show cause or the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g), it is ORDERED that Robert Seguin is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010); In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of respondent’s disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files a D.C. Bar. R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit. PER CURIAM

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.