Tigani v. Tigani

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CHRISOPHER J. TIGANI, Sr., § § Plaintiff Below, § Appellant, § § v. § § ROBERT F. TIGANI, Sr., Trustee § and Individually, § § Defendant Below, § Appellee, § § and § § NKS DISTRIBUTORS, INC., a § Delaware corporation, § § Nominal Defendant-Below, § Appellee. § No. 190, 2021 Court Below—Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware C.A. No. 2017-0786 Submitted: November 19, 2021 Decided: January 25, 2022 Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN, and TRAYNOR, Justices. ORDER After careful consideration of the parties’ briefs, the record on appeal, and the appellant’s motion for oral argument, we have determined that oral argument is unnecessary. We conclude that the judgment below of the Court of Chancery in its post-trial opinion dated March 30, 2021 and its final order and judgment dated May 28, 2021 should be affirmed. Although we need not address every nuance of the complex record, the factual record and carefully detailed findings by the trial court adequately support the conclusions of the Court of Chancery. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion for oral argument is DENIED and the judgment of the Court of Chancery is AFFIRMED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.