Bennett v. Jacobs
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MICHAEL BENNETT,1 Petitioner Below, Appellant, v. JENNIFER JACOBS, Respondent Below, Appellee. § § § § § § § § § § § § No. 477, 2018 Court Below—Family Court of the State of Delaware File No. CN08-05031 Petition Nos. 13-38057, 14-16798 Submitted: August 2, 2019 Decided: August 19, 2019 ORDER This 19th day of August 2019, it appears to the Court that: (1) The appellant filed this appeal from a Family Court order concerning visitation with the appellant’s minor child. The opening brief was due to be filed by June 24, 2019. When the appellant did not file the brief, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a brief delinquency notice, dated July 2, 2019, advising the appellant that the brief must be filed within seven days. The appellant did not respond to the brief delinquency notice and did not file the opening brief. 1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 7(d). (2) On July 12, 2019, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice, by certified mail, directing the appellant to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for failure to file the opening brief. The notice to show cause directed the appellant to respond within ten days and advised him that if he did not respond, dismissal of the appeal would be deemed to be unopposed. (3) The appellant’s address has changed multiple times since he filed this appeal. When he filed the appeal, the appellant was incarcerated; it appears that he has since been released. The July 12 notice to show cause and the July 2 brief delinquency notice were both sent to the most recent address that the Court has for the appellant. On July 22, 2019, the July 12 notice to show cause was returned to the Clerk’s office, marked by the postal service as undeliverable. The July 2 brief delinquency notice has not been returned. The Clerk’s office contacted the Family Court and the Department of Correction and neither had an updated address for the appellant. The Clerk’s office also contacted the appellant’s probation officer, who stated that he does not have an updated address for the appellant and that the appellant never reported to probation as directed. (4) The appellant having failed to respond to the notice to show cause within the required ten-day period, to file the opening brief, or to report any change of address to the Court, dismissal of this action is deemed unopposed. 2 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 29(b) and 3(b)(2), that the appeal is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Justice 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
